Selecione seu idioma

sábado, 31 de dezembro de 2011

Feliz Ano Novo! Happy New Year!


Feliz Ano Novo!
Que durante umas poucas horas, possamos alimentar o sonho de um "Feliz Ano Novo".

Happy New Year!
That for a few hours, we can feed the dream of a"Happy New Year."


quarta-feira, 28 de dezembro de 2011

2012: years old


The "New Year, 2012, born aged, sick, worn out, depleted by the action of a" Species Insane. "

New perfumes -  smells old.

New hells for old sins.

Neon light in the windows - battlefields form rivers of blood.

Christmas decoration -  urban traffic killer.

New songs at top volume to drown out the noise of urban violence.

New discourses - old corrupt practices.

New clothes - old ambitions.

Hair combed - anesthetized conscience.

New cars - old roads killer.

Mouths full - empty hearts.

Toys and gifts: starving children.

Hugs and kisses -  sweatshops.

New promises - old debts.

Handshakes -  guns cocked.

Optimistic forecasts -  economic slavery.

New technological achievements -  felled forests.

Cups and cutlery on the tables - polluted water.

New ships -  oceans oxidized.

Supersonic aircraft -  not atmosphere.

GPS -  to show the path that leads to death.

New laws -  old crimes.

New churches - old sins.

New philosophies -  devaluation of life.

New governments - failed states.

New spending - social inequalities.

New information - old indifference.

Air conditioning in homes - global warming.

New drugs - old diseases.

New economy - old waste.

Tables with plenty of food - misery forgotten.

Many colors - no common sense.

Very design, weak content.

Many followers - devious purposes.

Too much noise in the empty can.

Unhappy "Old Year", is born aging by the action of a nefarious "Insane Species."

Many toys -  no science.

Lots of fun -  little action.

Much of the information, no application humanitarian.

Lack truths, many lies.

Many "I" just "us".



RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brazil, Curitiba, December 28, 2011 - 19h: 37

2012 nasce envelhecido: Insanidade de uma espécie

O "Ano Novo, de 2012, que nasce envelhecido, doente, desgastado, empobrecido, pela ação de uma "Espécie Insana".

Novos perfumes; antigos odores.

Novos infernos, para antigos pecados.

Luz de Neon nas vitrinas;  campos de batalhas formam rios de sangue.

Decoração de Natal; trânsito urbano assassino.

Novas músicas, em alto volume, para abafar o ruído da violência urbana.

Novos discursos; velhas práticas corruptas.

Roupas novas; antigas ambições.

Cabelos penteados; consciências anestesiadas.

Carros novos; velhas estradas assassinas.

Bocas cheias; corações vazios.

Brinquedos e brindes: crianças famintas.

Abraços e beijos; salários miseráveis.

Novas promessas; dívidas velhas.

Apertos de mãos; armas engatilhadas.

Previsões otimistas; escravidão econômica.

Novas conquistas tecnológicas; Florestas derrubadas.

Copos e talheres nas mesas; água poluída.

Novos navios; oceanos oxidados.

Aviões supersônicos; atmosfera condenada.

GPS; para mostrar o caminho que leva à morte.

Novas leis: velhos crimes.

Novas igrejas; velhos pecados.

Novas filosofias; desvalorização da vida.

Novos governos; Estados falidos.

Novos gastos; desigualdades sociais.

Novas informações: velha indiferença.

Ar condicionado nas residências; aquecimento global.

Novos remédios; velhas doenças.

Novas economias; velhos desperdícios.

Mesas com fartura de alimentos; miséria esquecida.

Muitas cores; nenhum bom-senso.

Muitos desenhos; fraco conteúdo.

Muitos seguidores:  propósitos inconfessáveis.

Muito barulho em lata vazia.

Infeliz "Ano Velho", já nasce envelhecido pela ação nefasta de uma "Espécie Insana".

Muitos brinquedos, nenhuma Ciência.

Muita diversão; poucas ações.

Muitas informações; nenhuma aplicação humanitária.

Falta verdades; muitas mentiras.

Muitos "Eu"; poucos "Nós".



RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brasil, Curitiba, 28 de dezembro de 2011 - 19h:37

quinta-feira, 22 de dezembro de 2011

Poder da Corrupção Institucionalizada: Jogo Bruto

O embate "político", entre o Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ) e diferentes Associações representativas dos Magistrados Brasileiros, é revelador, emblemático e inquietante.

Revelador: Desnuda a Institucionalização da corrupção, contaminando diferentes esferas do Poder Republicano, ameaçando o Estado Democrático de Direito.

Emblemático: A Institucionalização da Corrupção contamina todos os princípios emanados da Carta Magna, normativos basilares da Ética, Moral e dos Bons Costumes Universais.

Inquietante: Na medida que revela o jogo bruto do poder da corrupção, ameaçando pessoas e instituições comprometidas com a moralidade pública, com os princípios da "Prevenção Geral", "Justiça", "Transparência", "Equidade", "Legalidade com legitimidade", entre outros.

Resultante: Promove a Impunidade e a contaminação ética dos tecidos e órgãos sociais, subordinados às mais altas esferas do Poder Republicano.

O corporativismo protecionista, em qualquer das diferentes esferas do Poder Republicano, compromete as estruturas de sustentação da Legitimidade do Poder.


RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brasil, Curitiba, 22 de dezembro de 2011 - 22h:08

quarta-feira, 21 de dezembro de 2011

Santa Claus is not dead, is alive!


Santa Claus was in my house in Curitiba, when I was not home.

He left a panettone, a pitcher with flowers, a sports shirt and a pair of shorts, with my mother, who lives next door.

I can not identify who it was.

Do not let the card, did not identify himself, and I'm surprised.

I have no doubt, was the Santa Claus, Lapland traveled to Curitiba.

The good man or good woman, gave evidence of their existence.

Merry Christmas to Santa Claus, you liked me in surprising ways.

Thank you Santa, you do not know how happy I am, this Christmas.

I'm sorry to be saying that you died.

You are invited back to my house before Christmas, you want to hug and kiss.

After many decades of existence, you make me cry with joy.

RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brazil, Curitiba, December 21, 2011 - 20h: 16

Papai Noel não morreu, está vivo.




Papai Noel esteve em minha casa, em Curitiba, no momento em que eu não estava em casa.

Deixou um Panetone, uma jarro com flores, uma camisa esportiva e uma bermuda, com a minha sogra, que reside ao lado.

Não consigo identificar quem foi.

Não deixou cartão, não identificou-se, e estou surpreso.

Não tenho dúvidas, foi o Papai Noel, viajou da Lapônia até Curitiba.

O bom homem, ou a boa mulher,  deu provas de sua existência.

Feliz Natal para o Papai Noel,  você agradou-me  de forma  surpreendente.

Obrigado Papai Noel, você não sabe o quanto estou feliz, neste Natal.

Estou arrependido de estar dizendo que você morreu.

Você está convidado a voltar em minha casa, antes do Natal, quero  abraçar-te e dar um beijo.

Depois de muitas décadas de existência, você me faz chorar, de alegria.

RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brasil, Curitiba, 21 de dezembro de 2011 - 20h:16

sábado, 17 de dezembro de 2011

Denúncia: A falência do Estado, na prestação jurisdicional.




Exemplo típico da ineficiência, total falência  do Estado, na prestação Jurisdicional, proteção e segurança pública, acaba de ocorrer em Curitiba, uma das mais conceituadas cidades do Brasil.

Uma tragédia cívica, diante da qual, o cidadão, indefeso, não sabe reagir.



No recém inaugurado Supermercado Condor, no bairro Água Verde, Curitiba, Paraná, foi instalada uma agência do "Banco Popular", criado com o objetivo de facilitar a vida do cidadão, no pagamento de contas, evitando as infindáveis filas das agências bancárias tradicionais.





Com pouco tempo de funcionamento, a referida agência do "Banco do Povo", no Condor Água Verde, um dos bairros nobres de Curitiba, foi assaltada, e o Banco do Brasil e o "Condor" optaram pelo fechamento da referida agência, por "falta de segurança".





Os bandidos é que mandam no Brasil.

Só pode funcionar agências populares, onde "Eles" permitem.

As Autoridades do Estado, estão reféns da bandidagem.



Não foi colocado policiamento ostensivo, nenhuma proteção especial, a única solução foi fechar a agência, que funcionava no referido Supermercado.



Ainda, na mesma localização, diante do portão de acesso do mesmo mercado, o Estado inaugurou uma "Cabine da PM", que durante alguns poucos dias, havia uma viatura policial militar de prontidão ostensiva.  A Cabine Militar está abandonada, e nunca mais foi visto viaturas ou policiais dando proteção aos cidadãos





Ainda na mesma área, existe o "Cemitério da Água Verde", onde os familiares enlutados, enfrentando a dor da separação definitiva, não podem estacionar seus veículos, pois nesta área, existe a maior incidência estatística de roubos furtos de veículos em Curitiba.



Depois de várias reportagens da RPC, durante poucos dias, os guardas municipais deram plantão ostensivo, mas já sumiram também.

E o cidadão, que pagas taxas e impostos extorsivos, não pode nem chorar seu morto, tem que passar a madrugada vigiando o carro estacionado numa área nobre,  sem nenhuma proteção policial




RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Curitiba, 17 de dezembro de 2011 - 10h:52

sexta-feira, 16 de dezembro de 2011

Urgent Notice: Santa Claus died





"Papai Noel", in Brazil, or "Pai Natal" , in Portugal, "Noël", in France, is a legendary figure who, in many Western cultures, brought gifts to the homes of good children on Christmas Eve.

According to legend, Santa Claus lived in the Far North, a land of eternal snow. In the American version, he lived at his home in North Pole, while the British version is often said that he lived in the mountains of Korvatunturi in Lapland, Finland.

Santa Claus lived with his wife Mrs. Claus, Elves countless magicians and nine flying reindeer. Another popular legend says that he made a list of children around the world, classifying them according to their behavior, and gave gifts such as toys or candy, all the boys and girls well-behaved in the world, and sometimes Coal children misbehave on the night of Christmas Eve.

Santa accomplished this feat with the help of annual elves who make toys in the workshop, and the reindeer pulling the sleigh.

According to reports, the last few hours, reported by major news agencies, Santa, "Papai Noel", "Pai Natal", or St. Nicholas, died.

The snow melted the North Pole, as a result of global warming, and nine reindeer drowned in the floods that ravaged Lapland, Finland.

The Elves also died trying to save the reindeer, who could not fly due to the amount of CO2 and methane in the atmosphere of Lapland.

The melting snow has caused a catastrophic flood, sweeping away houses and everything else that existed in the region.

The flood caused the death of well-behaved children that Santa Claus presented with toys and sweets.

The flood caused the death, too, children misbehave, they received coal.

Santa Claus, in a panic, suspected that the melting snow was caused by the industry that produced the coal, which he used at Christmas to punish misbehaving kids.

Distressed and ill, in consequence of such events, Santa Claus returned to his home in Lapland, in an attempt to save Mrs. Claus, and, gathering their belongings, turned on the TV to watch the retrospective of 2011, with the following News:

Floods in Pakistan, where children, who loved Santa Claus, were the main victims ...

Famine in Africa killing children that Santa loved ...

The failure of the COP17 meeting...

The output of Canada's Kyoto Protocol...

The Santa Claus distributed sweets that were contaminated by the atomic radiation leaked from the Fukushima nuclear power plant...

Brazil has not signed the Protocol to combat corruption, which diverted the money for the purchase of Brazilian children of school meals...

That the Legislative deformed the Brazilian Forestry Code, a document changing the Code of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon...

That the oil spilled in the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil, was destroying all marine species...

Finally, before the retrospective of 2011 was over, Santa Claus suffered a heart attack.

Your body will be incinerated by the will of Mrs. Claus, and the ashes will be distributed to the rulers of the whole Earth, with the following message:

"You have destroyed the dream of a better world."


The sad Christmas 2011 - (The year that never ended)

Santa Claus - Finland

Notícia urgente: Papai Noel morreu



Papai Noel, Brasil, ou Pai Natal, Portugal, "Noël", França, é uma figura lendária que, em muitas culturas ocidentais, trazia presentes aos lares de crianças bem-comportadas na  Noite de Natal.

Conforme a lenda, Papai Noel morava no Extremo Norte, numa terra de neve eterna. Na versão americana, ele morava em sua casa no Polo Norte, enquanto na versão britânica frequentemente se dizia que ele residia nas montanhas de Korvatunturi na Lapônia, Finlândia. 

Papai Noel vivia com sua esposa Mamãe Noel, incontáveis Elfos mágicos e  nove renas voadoras. Outra lenda popular diz que ele fazia uma lista de crianças ao redor do mundo, classificando-as de acordo com seu comportamento, e que entregava presentes, como brinquedos ou doces, a todos os garotos e garotas bem-comportados no mundo, e às vezes carvão às crianças mal-comportadas, na noite da véspera de Natal. 

Papai Noel realizava esse feito anual com o auxílio de elfos, que fazem os brinquedos na oficina, e das renas que puxavam o trenó.

Segundo as notícias,  nas últimas horas, divulgadas pelas principais agências de notícias, Papai Noel, Pai Natal, Noël, ou São Nicolau, morreu.

A neve do Polo Norte derreteu, em consequência do aquecimento global,  e as nove renas morreram afogadas, na enchente que arrasou a Lapônia, Finlândia.

Os Elfos também morreram, tentando salvar as renas, que não conseguiram voar devido a grande quantidade de CO2 e de gás Metano na atmosfera da Lapônia.

A neve derretida, provocou uma enchente catastrófica, arrasando casas e tudo o mais que existia na região.

A enchente provocou a morte das crianças bem-comportadas que Papai Noel presenteava com brinquedos e doces.

A enchente provocou a morte, também,  das crianças mal-comportadas, que recebiam carvão.

Papai Noel, em pânico, suspeitou que o derretimento da neve foi provocado pela indústria que produzia o carvão, que ele usava, no Natal, para castigar  as crianças mal-educadas.

Angustiado, e doente, em consequência de tais acontecimentos, Papai Noel retornou ao seu lar, na Lapônia, na tentativa de salvar Mamãe Noel, e, enquanto juntavam seus pertences, ligou a Televisão para assistir a retrospectiva do ano de 2011, com as seguintes notícias:

Enchentes no Paquistão, em que as crianças, que Papai Noel amava, foram as principais vítimas...

Fome na África matando as crianças que Papai Noel amava...

O fracasso da reunião COP17, 

A saída do Canadá do Protocolo de Kyoto, 

Os doces que Papai Noel distribuía estavam contaminados pela pela radiação atômica que vazou da usina nuclear de Fukushima, 

O Brasil não assinou o protocolo de combate à corrupção, que desviava o dinheiro destinado à compra da merenda escolar das crianças brasileiras, 

Que o Legislativo Brasileiro deformou o Código Florestal, transformando o documento num Código de Desflorestamento da Amazônia Brasileira,

Que o petróleo derramado no Golfo do México e no Brasil, estava destruindo todas as espécies marítimas, 

Enfim, antes que a retrospectiva de 2011 chegasse ao fim, Papai Noel sofreu um ataque cardíaco.

Seu corpo será incinerado, por vontade da Mamãe Noel, e as cinzas serão distribuídas aos governantes de todo o Planeta Terra, com a seguinte mensagem:

"Vocês destruíram o sonho de um mundo melhor".


O triste Natal de 2011- (O ano que nunca acabou)

Papai Noel - Finlândia




quinta-feira, 15 de dezembro de 2011

Direito de Resistência



Com fundamentação jurídica no "Direito de Resistência", declaramos a "Incompetência" e a "Suspeição", do Legislativo Brasileiro...




Contra a "incompetência" e a "suspeição", juridicamente, do "Legislativo Brasileiro", invocamos o "Direito de Resistência"...




O "Legislativo Brasileiro", deixou de representar a vontade do povo, cuja soberania é que outorga a representação...




O princípio básico do "Equilíbrio dos Poderes, dos "Pesos-e-contra-pesos", está quebrado, devido a conivência com a corrupção...




A Nação Brasileira, e os princípios fundamentais de um "Estado Democrático de Direito", estão sendo violados pelo próprio "Legislativo".




O "Legislativo Brasileiro" está "incompetente", e sob "Suspeição", para legislar, e é uma ameaça à República...




O "Legislativo Brasileiro", enquanto não expurgar o crime de corrupção" de seus quadros, está sob suspeição...




O "Legislativo Brasileiro" perdeu a legitimidade da outorgada representatividade da vontade popular do povo brasileiro...




A "Lei da Palmada" é mais uma das milhares de aberrações jurídicas, emanadas de um "Legislativo" corrupto, e sem conhecimento técnicos...




Os "Direitos de Família" são "Subjetivos", "Fundamentais", transcendem os "Diretos Objetivos"...




A "Lei da Palmada" é uma violação "Inconstitucional", dos "Direitos Fundamentais"...




A "Lei da Palmada" é Imoral, pois o Legislativo brasileiro perdeu a credibilidade para legislar, enquanto não acabar, com a corrupção...




A "Lei da Palmada" é Inconstitucional, pois viola os "Direitos da Família"...




@gp_vidapublica OAB: Lei da Palmada sem orientação familiar é inócua bit.ly/ugm940




RT @rede_globo_prtv Deputados estaduais do PR recebem 14º e 15º salários todos os anos http://dlvr.it/10LrxF




Escravidão ou cinismo, é o destino: de todos os que perdem a capacidade de indignação. @ruisaldanha  http://www.dia-da-terra.blogspot.com/




"Lei da Palmada": Hipócrita e demagógica... Acabem primeiro com a corrupção, só depois terão autoridade moral para legislar sobre a família




O Brasil sem salários dignos, hospitais, presídios, universidades, estradas, casas para o povo, escolas... mas tem a "Lei da Palmada"




Os corrutos que roubam o dinheiro público, são os responsáveis por legislar para os cidadãos, que não podem dar uma palmada nos filhos...




"Lei do Chicote": #Corrupção no #Brasil: Tipificação Penal de "Crime Hediondo", "Inafiançável", e Competência do "Juri Popular"... "Já!"




É lícito: roubar dinheiro público, corromper, fraudar, mentir e muito mais... É ilícito: educar os filhos...




A "Lei da Palmada" é uma prova incontestável, que os legisladores brasileiros atingiram o cume da desfaçatez civilizatória...




"Lei da Palmada": Quem será responsabilizado pela educação das crianças? Os legisladores imbecis, os traficantes de drogas, ou a PM?




"Lei da Palmada": Se os pais não podem mais educar seus filhos, construam novos presídios...




"Lei da Palmada": Os pais estão proibidos de educar seus filhos! Quem vai educar? Os Políticos corrutos que fazem Leis com este conteúdo?




"Lei da Palmada": Os pais não podem educar seus filhos, mas os políticos corruptos podem roubar o dinheiro da merenda escolar...




"Lei da Palmada": Os pais não podem educar seus filhos, mas os políticos corruptos podem roubar o dinheiro da merenda escolar.




"Lei da Palmada": Os pais não podem dar palmadas em seus filhos, mas os traficantes podem vender drogas às crianças....




"Lei da Palmada": Os pais não podem dar palmadas em seus filhos, mas os traficantes podem vender drogas às crianças....




Equação da Corrupção no Brasil  http://dia-da-terra.blogspot.com/2011/12/equacao-da-corrupcao-no-brasil.html?spref=tw #Corrupção #Brasil




Escravidão ou cinismo, é o destino: de todos os que perdem a capacidade de indignação. @ruisaldanha  http://www.dia-da-terra.blogspot.com/


RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Um cidadão brasileiro indignado
Brasil, Curitiba, 15 de dezembro de 2011 - 19h:52





quarta-feira, 14 de dezembro de 2011

Indignação ou Escravidão? Slavery or indignation?

Escolha seu destino: Indignação, Cinismo ou Escravidão?

Deciding the future:   Slavery or indignation?

Escravidão ou cinismo, é o destino: de todos os que perdem a capacidade de indignação. @ruisaldanha www.dia-da-terra.blogspot.com/



Slavery or cynicism, is the destination: to all who lose their capacity for indignation.
@ruisaldanha www.dia-da-terra.blogspot.com/


Brasil, Curitiba, 14 de dezembro de 2011 - 07h:33

segunda-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2011

2011: O "ano eterno", que nunca vai acabar...

2011 é o ano que nunca vai acabar, será eterno.

Não vamos comemorar  a chegada de 2012, embora só faltem 18 dias, no calendário antigo, quando os anos tinham"início" e "fim", em 365 dias...

2011 não vai acabar nos próximos 18 dias:

Os fantasmas de 1929, assombrando a Europa, não desaparecerão, em 18 dias...

Fukushima não retornara à vida normal, em 18 dias...

O Japão não reorganizará sua economia devastada pelo terremoto e o Tsunami, em 18 dias...

O "Tumor do Lula", passatempo preferido da Mídia Brasileira, não desaparecerá em 18 dias...

Os Clubes rebaixados para a Classe "B" do "Brasileirão", não conseguirão retornar a Série "A", em 18 dias...

A Guerra Civil na Síria não vai acabar nos próximos 18 dias...

O rompimento do Canadá com o Protocolo de Kyoto, só para não pagar as multas que deve por ser poluidor, não será reparado nos próximos 18 dias...

A Corrupção no Brasil, que destrói sonhos, caráter, e acaba com a cidadania, mas enche o bolso dos corruptos, não vai acabar nos próximos 18 dias...

O vergonhoso texto do "Código de Desflorestamento do Brasil", que privilegia os destruidores de florestas, perdoa dívidas, não será extinto nos próximos 18 dias...

O aviltante, vergonhoso e indigno valor do salário mínimo, não será reajustado nos próximos 18 dias...

A maior carga tributária do Planeta Terra, cobrado no Brasil, não resultará em benefícios sociais nos próximos 18 dias...

Os políticos corruptos brasileiros,  não criarão vergonha na cara, nos próximos 18 dias...

A violência urbana intolerável, nas cidades brasileiras, não será combatida com seriedade e eficiência, nos próximos 18 dias...

As catástrofes ambientais, consequências do aquecimento global,  não vão acabar nos próximos 18 dias...

O espetáculo deprimente do COP17, em Durban, não será esquecido em 18 dias...

As "Cracolândias", existentes nas principais cidades brasileiras, não acabarão, nos próximos 18 dias...

Os prejuízos causados pelas catastróficas enchentes,  em inumeráveis Cidades do Mundo, não serão reparados nos próximos 18 dias...

Os movimentos dos "indignados" com o atual modelo da economia mundial, não serão pacificados e retornarão aos seus lares, nos próximos 18 dias...

Os Iranianos não desistirão de acabar com Israel, e nem os Israelenses desistirão de acabar com o Irã, nos próximos 18 dias...

A Faixa de Gaza não será pacificada nos próximos 18 dias...

Os preços dos alimentos não diminuirão, nos próximos 18 dias...

Os vulcões não dormirão, nem as placas tectônicas descansarão, nos próximos 18 dias...

As emissões de CO2 e gás Metano, não diminuirão nos próximos 18 dias...

As florestas devastadas não serão recuperadas em 18 dias...

Os conflitos armados, a fome, a miséria, a exploração infantil, a violência doméstica, a exploração e a especulação econômica, a venda de armas, o tráfico de drogas,  a violência no trânsito, nada vai acabar nos próximos 18 dias...

As espécies em extinção não ressuscitarão nos próximos 18 dias...

A lista é interminável, de fatores que quebraram o espaço-tempo clássico, sem considerar o que ainda vai acontecer nos próximos 18 dias, e que impedirá o fim de 2011...

2011, o ano que não vai acabar...


RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brasil, Curitiba, 12 de dezembro de 2011 (o ano que nunca acabou), 22h:42








domingo, 11 de dezembro de 2011

The Future of Humanity: The only certainty ...


Image Google

The only certainty is that humanity's future is uncertain.

The COP17 Conference in Durban for the UN, once again, failed.

The statements made by UN Secretary General, that an agreement was signed at the last minute, is inconsistent and propagandist, not to admit the failure of the negotiations.

It was evident, once again, now on climate change, the gap between the rich and poor nations.

The UN has always fulfilled its mission of making attempts to promote peace in the world, ending hunger and poverty, to avoid bloody conflicts, unnecessary wars, balance of the global economy, protecting the rights of women, children, education, disease, but always attempts were frustrated, because what prevails and determines the future of humanity are powerful economic interests, led by the wealthiest nations on earth. It was ever thus, and it is illusory to think that will change.

We live in permanent wars and conflicts of interest on each and any problem, whether local, regional, or global.

The economic and industrial progress built the current model of the world economy, but the same economic model is destroying any possibility of a better future for generations to come.

The climate issue, with changes occurring at a dizzying scale, reaching the major urban centers with environmental disasters of major proportions, reflected in food prices, water shortages, death, disease, massive financial losses in transport, communications, is more than one aggravating factor on the world stage.

At this point, that the attempt of a climate agreement failed because agreement can not happen, and even if an agreement had been concluded, the parties do not comply, it became clear the only certainty about the future of humanity: environmental Tragedies of large proportions.

There is strong evidence, thousands of reports, reported facts, research, models, calculations, indicating a steep escalation of climate change, with consequences geological, economic, structural, that will affect the future of human life on Planet Earth.

With Planet Earth nothing will happen, just one of thousands of changes have occurred in the geological past.

But there are major uncertainties about the future of our species.

Climate change and geological past we humans were not here.

The world economy did not depend on sophisticated technologies that could be affected by weather.

Although people, governments, all remain indifferent, there is a clear link between earthquakes, hurricanes, earth's rotation, magnetic axis, movement of the winds, the direction of ocean currents, magnetic shielding, extinction of marine species, destruction of forests, towering CO2 and methane gas, everything is directly related.

Climate change will affect and geological large water storage dams, will affect the structures of nuclear power plants, as happened in Japan, the tsunami will destroy the heavily populated coastal areas, the methane gas and high concentrations of CO2 is already making unbreathable air, sea levels rising, glaciers melting, significant increase in the number and intensity of earthquakes in major urban areas, intense movement of tectonic plates, and more added all the right result is: an uncertain future for us, and all other living species that depend on the environment.

Other species can survive in any environment adaptation: fungi, bacteria, reptiles, and others. But the more evolved species of life are committed to the future.

But the global economic interests are concerned and committed to other priorities: fun, weapons, speculation, economic, territorial conquests, easy profit, trade, political and ideological clashes, exploitation of labor, slave labor, drug sales, new models of equipment electronics.

It remains one certainty: the future is uncertain.

At the end of another year ends, the 2011, let's wait for the statistics of environmental tragedies of next year, 2012.

Wishing a Happy New Year, in late 2011, not optimism, but irresponsibility and alienation, before coming on stage for the next year.


RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brazil, Curitiba, December 11, 2011 - 11h: 23

O Futuro da Humanidade: A única certeza...

A  única certeza é que o futuro da humanidade é incerto.

A Conferência do #COP17, em #Durban, promovida pela ONU, mais uma vez, fracassou.

As declarações do Secretário Geral da ONU, de que um acordo foi firmado na última hora, é inconsistente e propagandista, para não admitir o fracasso das negociações.

Ficou evidente, mais uma vez, agora na questão climática,  o abismo que separa as Nações ricas e as Nações pobres.

A ONU sempre cumpriu a sua missão de fazer  tentativas de promover a Paz no Mundo, acabar com a fome e a miséria, evitar conflitos sangrentos, guerras desnecessárias, equilíbrio da economia mundial, proteção dos direitos das mulheres, crianças, educação, doenças, mas sempre foram tentativas frustradas, pois o que prevalece e determina o futuro da humanidade são os poderosos interesses econômicos, comandados pelas Nações mais ricas da Terra. Sempre foi assim,  e é ilusão pensar que vai mudar.

Vivemos em permanentes guerras e conflitos de interesses, sobre todos e qualquer problema, seja local , regional, ou mundial.

O progresso econômico-industrial construiu o atual modelo da economia mundial, mas o mesmo modelo de economia está destruindo qualquer possibilidade de um futuro melhor para as próximas gerações.

A  questão climática, com as mudanças ocorrendo numa escala vertiginosa, atingindo os grandes centros urbanos, com desastres ambientais de grandes proporções, com reflexos nos preços da alimentação, a falta de água, mortes, doenças, prejuízos financeiros gigantescos nos transportes, comunicações, é mais um fator agravante do cenário mundial.

Neste momento, em que a tentativa de um acordo sobre o clima fracassou, pois não aconteceu acordo algum, e mesmo que tivesse sido celebrado um acordo, as partes envolvidas não o cumpririam,  ficou evidente a única certeza sobre o futuro da humanidade: Tragédias ambientais de grandes proporções.

Há fortes evidências, milhares de relatórios, fatos relatados, pesquisas, modelos testados, cálculos, que indicam uma escalada vertiginosa das mudanças climáticas, com consequências geológicas, econômicas, estruturais, que vai afetar o futuro da vida humana no Planeta Terra.

Com o Planeta Terra não vai acontecer nada, só mais uma das milhares de mudanças já ocorridas no passado geológico.

Mas há grandes incertezas sobre o futuro da nossa espécie.

Nas mudanças climáticas e geológicas anteriores nós, humanos, não estávamos aqui.

A Economia Mundial não dependia das tecnologias sofisticadas que poderiam ser afetadas pelo clima.

Embora as pessoas, os governantes, todos, permaneçam indiferentes, há um evidente link entre terremotos, furacões, rotação da Terra, Eixo Magnético, movimentos dos ventos, direção das correntes oceânicas, proteção magnética, extinção das espécies marinhas, destruição das florestas, altíssimas emissões de CO2 e gás Metano, tudo está diretamente relacionada.

As alterações climáticas e geológicas vai afetar grandes represas de contenção de água, vai afetar as estruturas das usinas nucleares, já aconteceu no Japão, as Tsunamis vai destruir as áreas costeiras densamente povoadas, o gás metano e as altas concentrações de CO2 já está tornando o ar irrespirável, o nível dos oceanos subindo, as geleiras derretendo, aumento significativo do número e intensidade dos terremotos em grandes áreas urbanas, movimentação intensa das placas tectônicas, tudo e muito mais somados, o resultado certo é: um futuro incerto para a nossa, e todas as demais espécies vivas, que dependem do meio-ambiente.

Sobreviverão outras espécies capazes de adaptação em qualquer ambiente: fungos, bactérias, répteis, e outras. Mas as espécies mais evoluídas de vida estão com o futuro comprometido.

Mas os interesses econômicos globais estão preocupados e comprometidos com outras prioridades: diversão, armas, especulação econômica, conquistas territoriais, lucro fácil, comércio, embates políticos e ideológicos, exploração da mão-de-obra escrava, venda de drogas, novos modelos de equipamentos eletrônicos.

Resta uma certeza: o futuro é incerto.

No final de mais um ano que encerra, o de 2011, vamos aguardar as estatísticas das tragédias ambientais do próximo ano, de 2012.

Desejar um Feliz Ano novo, neste final de 2011, não será otimismo, mas irresponsabilidade e alienação, diante do cenário que aproxima-se para os próximos anos.


RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brasil, Curitiba, 11 de Dezembro de 2011- 11h:23

terça-feira, 6 de dezembro de 2011

Equação da Corrupção no Brasil

- Eleitores conscientes


- Cidadania


- Educação de boa qualidade


- Participação da sociedade organizada nas decisões políticas de Estado


- Mecanismos de controle


- Candidatos comprometidos com a Ética na Política


- Autonomia dos Órgãos de controle do dinheiro público


- Vontade política de enfrentar a corrupção no Brasil


- Transparência nas contas públicas


- Racionalização da máquina pública


- Eficiência técnica e administrativa na administração pública


- Mecanismos de punição exemplar, automática, nos casos de desvios de conduta


- Punição aos infratores da Lei, na atividade pública


- Mecanismos de aferição da eficiência administrativa na atividade pública


- Auditorias independentes e desvinculadas do corporativismo administrativo


- Auditorias autônomas








X




+ Ação fraudulenta dos cabos eleitorais durante as campanhas


 + Candidatos corruptos


+ Eleitores corruptos e corruptores


+ Favorecimentos pessoais


+  Indiferença e desrespeito aos princípios básicos da Constituição Federal


+ Tráfego de influências corporativas


+ Ausência de critérios técnicos na escolha de nomes para ocupar cargos importantes


+ Políticos corruptos ocupando cargos de liderança e confiança


+ Campanhas eleitorais financiadas por grupos econômicos e políticos


+ Votos de currais e cabrestos


+ Partidos políticos patrocinados por Caciques e Coronéis


+ Demagogia e cinismo


+ Impunidade


+Judiciário Jurássico e elitista


+ Desmoralização das Instituições Republicanas


+ Partidos políticos sem coerência pragmática com a ideologia declarada


=  Metástase da Corrupção, contaminando todos os tecidos, órgãos,  membros, em todo o organismo social.



RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brasil, Curitiba, 06 de Dezembro de 2011 - 18h:08





sábado, 3 de dezembro de 2011

@ruisaldanha: We invite all friends

We invite all friends, concerned about environmental issues in Brazil and the world, followers of  twitter@ruisaldanha, facebook@ruisaldanha.com and Blog   www.dia-da-terra.blogspot.com,  follow twitter@CuritibaZoom.

It would be very easy to change the avatar @ruisaldanha, but consider to be dishonest, to befollowed with a message, and then added,changing the purpose.

@ruisaldanha continue to develop your projectin English and in Portuguese @CuritibaZoom.

With the credibility gained in English, we develop the next stage of our project, in Portuguese for Brazilians.

All are welcome, and give back.

twittter@ruisaldanha.com
facebook@ruisaldanha.com
www.dia-da-terra.blogspot.com

And soon, our site www.curitibazoom.com.br, which is not yet operational.

Convite aos amigos de @ruisaldanha


Convidamos todos os  amigos, preocupados com as questões ambientais no Brasil e no Mundo, seguidores do twitter@ruisaldanha,  facebook@ruisaldanha.com,  e do  Blog  www.dia-da-terra.blogspot.com,  a seguir o twitter@CuritibaZoom.

Seria muito fácil mudar o Avatar do @ruisaldanha, mas consideramos ser desonesto, ser seguido com uma mensagem, e depois de adicionado, mudar o propósito.

@ruisaldanha continuará desenvolvendo seu projeto em inglês, e @CuritibaZoom em português.

Com a credibilidade conquistada, em Ingles, desenvolvemos a etapa seguinte do nosso projeto, em Português, para os brasileiros.

Todos são bem-vindos, e retribuiremos.

twittter@ruisaldanha.com
facebook@ruisaldanha.com
www.dia-da-terra.blogspot.com

E em breve, o nosso Site www.curitibazoom.com.br , que ainda não está operacional.

domingo, 27 de novembro de 2011

Value of π

In mathematics, "π" numerical proportion is a unique interface between the magnitudes of the perimeter  of a circunferênciae its diameter  , in other words, if a circle has a perimeter and diameter, then that number is equal to .  It is represented by the Greek letter π. The Greek letter π (read: pi), was adopted for the number from the Greek word for perimeter "περίμετρος," probably by William Jones em1706, and popularized by Leonhard Euler some years later.Other names for this constant are constantcircular or constant Archimedes number ofLudolph. (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.)






The timeline is cyclic in a circle:

Past, present and future has the value "π", ie is acircumference, or perimeter (diameter), said the Greeks.

The concept of "present time" is an illusion,because the "Today" was determined" Yesterday."

And "Tomorrow" is being determined "Today."

Translation: Tomorrow is Today.

"Today" is "Yesterday", and is also the"Tomorrow."

The timeline is cyclical, it has the the value of "π".

The Equation of "π" is determined in the past with a result in the future.

"This is" cause "and at the same time is" effect "


Past = Present + Future


Present = Past + Future


Future = Past + Present

To make a circle of cause and effect ...

RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brazil, Curitiba, 26 November 2011 - 14h: 12




Valor de π

Na matemática, é uma proporção numérica originada da relação entre as grandezas do perímetro de uma circunferênciae seu diâmetro; por outras palavras, se uma circunferência tem perímetro e diâmetro , então aquele número é igual a . É representado pela letra grega π. A letra grega π (lê-se: pi), foi adotada para o número a partir da palavra grega para perímetro, "περίμετρος", provavelmente por William Jones em1706, e popularizada por Leonhard Euler alguns anos mais tarde. Outros nomes para esta constante são constante circular, constante de Arquimedes ou número de Ludolph. (Origem: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre.)




A linha do tempo é cíclica, em círculo:

Passado, presente e futuro tem o valor de "π", ou seja é uma circunferência, ou perímetro (diâmetro), disseram os Gregos.

O conceito de "tempo presente" é uma ilusão, pois o "Hoje" foi determinado "Ontem".

E o "Amanhã", está sendo determinado "Hoje".

Traduzindo: Amanhã é Hoje.

"Hoje" é "Ontem", e é também o "Amanhã".

A linha do tempo é cíclica, tem o o valor de "π".

A Equação do "π" é determinada no passado, com uma resultante no futuro.

O "Presente é "causa" e ao mesmo tempo é "efeito"

Passado = Presente + Futuro

Presente = Passado + Futuro

Futuro = Passado + Presente

Resumindo: uma circunferência de causas e efeitos...

RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brasil, Curitiba, 26 de novembro de 2011 - 14h:12



"Cold Iron"



In Brazil there is a popular expression that says, "There's no point in hammering cold iron"

In the New Testament it is recorded a saying of Jesus warned: ¨ Do not give pearls to swine "

The meaning is the same, and teaching is proven throughout the history of human evolution.

The professional trainers of animals are able to train them in any circus business or home, using a basic educational principle: when it hits reward, punish when it learns.

The human species is not able to learn any pedagogy that is used.

The obvious proof is traffic, excessive use of alcohol, drugs harmful to human health, improper diet, unnecessary wars, urban violence, poverty, hunger, disease, corruption, terrorism, pedophilia, child exploitation, violence against women and children waste of public funds, mismanagement, lies in electoral campaigns, economic speculation, and the list is endless examples that demonstrate man's inability to learn, even with pain and severe punishments.

The human species does not learn, the units are filled with trapped, hospitals and psychiatric care leave no doubt about man's inability to learn.

Council of the mother, the pastor, Father, psychologists, nothing resolves the human inability to learn from past mistakes.

The human species has always and will continue acting irresponsibly and irrationally in the face of dangers and threats to survival of our species.

Any reader aware and conscious of the international press, will be amazed at our inability to change the future.

The human species is unable to change the future for several reasons:

The first is because they do not study, does not investigate, does not question the historical past of our species, our planet, the universe.

The second reason is the desire of profit, financial greed, passion for easy profit, which inhibit clear vision.

Any kind of passion, love is, ideological, religious, political, including financial, inhibits the ability to think and act.

We are all passionate about the money, consumerism, making it impossible to view other ways and means of civilizing processes.

Overpopulation, environmental disasters and the financial waste of lives, caused by wars, bloody revolutions, terrorist attacks, crimes of passion, war, traffic, urban violence, finally, there is plenty of evidence to support and denounce the bleak future of our species.

And it was always the same, since the Garden of Eden when Eve and Adam did not obey the warnings of God.

No one believed Noah

Moses was angry at the unbelief and indifference of his people before the divine commandments.

The Bible Old Testament prophets were ridiculed, harassed, beaten and ignored by the people.

Jesus himself was crucified by hysterical crowds in search of emotions.

Paul, John the Baptist, Peter, finally, Buddha, Mohammed, Socrates, Plato, Gandhi, Copernicus, Galileo, thousands of examples of visionary men who "knit cold iron" and lives spent "giving pearls before swine."

Medicine, Astronomy, Philosophy, Education, Geology, Sociology, Psychology, Music, Art, and other areas of science and knowledge gained over millions of years of evolution, are disciplines that disseminate knowledge to a handful of visionary experts.

The crowds are mobilized and accessible to other more pressing interests: sex, drugs, fun, fantasies, bread, circuses and other issues also urgently needed.

The climate issue, caution is always just one of many that do not appeal to the public.

Warnings and daily news are repetitive and unnecessary, although distressing.

Now just waiting to happen, but with the certainty that we will not learn.

The only definitive and final solution to our species is the "mass extinction".

There is no hope, is an illusion to think that will change after millions of years, with all the technological progress achieved, we do not have the ability to learn from dogs, elephants, dolphins, horses, oxen, birds, and many other species living in our home .

"Never underestimate human stupidity"


RUI DE SOUZA SANTOS
Curitiba, Brazil, November 27, 2011 - 09h: 15

"Ferro frio"

No Brasil existe uma expressão popular que diz: "Não adianta malhar em ferro frio"

No Novo Testamento, está registrado uma palavra de Jesus advertiu: ¨Não dar pérolas aos porcos"

O sentido é o mesmo, e o ensino é comprovado ao longo de toda a História da evolução humana.

Os treinadores profissionais de animais são capazes de treiná-los em qualquer atividade circense ou doméstica, usando um princípio educacional básico: premiar quando acerta, castigar quando não aprende.

A espécie humana não é capaz de aprender, qualquer pedagogia que seja usada.

A prova evidente é o trânsito, o uso excessivo de bebidas alcoólicas, medicamentos nocivos à saúde humana, alimentação imprópria, guerras desnecessárias, violência urbana, miséria, fome, doenças, corrupção, terrorismo, pedofilia, exploração infantil, violência contra as mulheres e crianças, desperdício de dinheiro público, ineficiência administrativa, mentiras em campanhas eleitorais, especulação econômica, e a lista é interminável, de exemplos que demonstram a incapacidade humana de aprender, mesmo com sofrimentos e castigos severos.

A espécie humana não aprende, as unidades aprisionais estão repletas, os hospitais e os atendimentos psiquiátricos não deixam dúvidas sobre a incapacidade humana de aprender.

Conselho da mamãe, do pastor, do padre, dos psicólogos, nada resolve a incapacidade  humana de aprender com os erros do passado.

A espécie humana continua e continuará sempre agindo de forma irresponsável e irracional diante dos perigos e ameaças a sobrevivência de nossa espécie.

Qualquer leitor atento e consciente dos noticiários internacionais, ficará espantado com a nossa incapacidade de mudar o futuro.

A espécie humana é incapaz de mudar o futuro por várias razões:

A primeira é porque não estuda, não investiga, não questiona  o passado histórico da nossa espécie, do nosso planeta, do universo.

O segundo motivo é a ânsia do lucro, a ganância financeira, a paixão pelo lucro fácil, que inibe a visão lúcida.

Qualquer espécie de paixão, seja amorosa, ideológica, religiosa, política, inclusive a financeira, inibe a capacidade de raciocinar e agir.

Estamos todos apaixonados pelo dinheiro, pelo consumismo, impossibilitando a visão de outras formas e modalidades de processos civilizatórios.

A superpopulação, os desastres ambientais, o desperdício financeiro e de vidas, provocados pelas guerras, as revoluções sanguinárias, os ataques terroristas, os crimes passionais, a guerra do trânsito, a violência urbana, enfim, há uma abundância de evidências que comprovam e denunciam o futuro sombrio de nossa espécie.

E sempre foi igual, desde o Jardim do Éden, quando Eva e Adão não obedeceram as advertências divinas.

Ninguém acreditou em Noé.

Moisés ficou indignado diante da incredulidade e indiferença de seu povo diante dos mandamentos divinos.

Os profetas do Velho Testamento Bíblico foram ridicularizados, perseguidos, açoitados e ignorados pelo povo.

O próprio Jesus foi crucificado pelas multidões histéricas, em busca das emoções.

Paulo, João Batista, Pedro, enfim, Buda, Maomé, Sócrates, Platão,  Gandi, Copérnico, Galileu, milhares de exemplos de homens visionários, que "malharam em ferro frio" e gastaram vidas "dando pérolas aos porcos".

A Medicina, Astronomia, Filosofia, Pedagogia, Geologia, Sociologia, Psicologia, Música, Arte, e outras áreas da Ciência e do conhecimento adquirido ao longo de milhões de anos de evolução, são disciplinas que divulgam conhecimentos para meia dúzia de especialistas visionários.

As multidões estão mobilizadas e acessíveis para outros interesses mais urgentes: sexo, drogas, diversão, fantasias, pão, circo, e outras questões igualmente urgentes e necessárias.

A questão climática, que sempre alertamos é só mais uma das muitas outras que não despertam o interesse publico.

Os avisos e notícias diárias são repetitivas e desnecessárias, embora angustiantes.

Agora é só esperar acontecer, mas com a certeza que não aprenderemos.

A única e definitiva solução final para a nossa espécie é a "Extinção Massiva".

Não há esperanças, é ilusão pensar que vai mudar depois de milhões de anos, com todo o progresso tecnológico conquistado, não possuímos a capacidade de aprender dos cães, elefantes, golfinhos, cavalos, bois, pássaros, e tantas outras espécies do nosso convívio doméstico.

"Nunca subestime a estupidez humana"


RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Curitiba, Brasil, 27 de novembro de 2011 - 09h:15

Tsunami destroys city in under 7 minutes

quinta-feira, 10 de novembro de 2011

Conheça o Farol da Barra com a TV Marinha na Web [Marinha do Brasil]

A young ex-soldier adapts to life in post-conflict Libya

NASA | Swift Captures Flyby of Asteroid 2005 YU55

A young ex-soldier adapts to life in post-conflict Libya

Fresh earthquake strikes eastern Turkey

Google Maps taking armchair explorers to the Amazon

Google Street View maps the Amazon in Brazil

Police find Brazil drug Kingpin in Car boot

CCTV shows buildings collapsing in second Turkey earthquake

Quake footage captures hotel crumbling

NASA | New Model Predicts Fire Activity in South America

NASA | The Truth about 2012 - Solar Storms

Climbing Icebergs

ScienceCasts: Mystery of the Lunar Ionosphere

Toxic gas from underwater volcano closes coast in Canary Isl

Buildings collapse in deadly Turkey earthquake

Second Deadly Quake Hits Turkey, Traps Dozens

quarta-feira, 2 de novembro de 2011

#NASA | Operation #IceBridge Discovers Massive Crack in Ice Shelf

Disaster readiness training for the children of #Uzbekistan

Poor: the main raw material of the World Economy


The poor are the main source of wealth of the World Economy.

The poor generate higher profits for the rich.

The world's wealth is in the hands of 3% of world population.

97% of the population is poor, and increase the wealth of the rich 3%.

The poor are the main raw material of the World Economy.

The poor provide slave labor.

The poor consume food that is poor that the rich do not consume.

Is the poor who die in environmental disasters, moving the "industry of death."

The children of the poor are dying on the battlefield, in wars waged by the rich.

The poor countries buy weapons made by rich countries.

The poor feed the production of industrial machinery.

The poor is that the industry move from disposable products, poor quality, generating higher profits for companies.

Feeding the poor is the Industries of the "useless" ...

The poor are the consumerist culture of waste ...

The poor feed industry is that of childhood dreams ...

The poor do not consume the products that interest to the rich ...

The poor move profits religions ...

The poor is feeding the profits of corruption, with the money stolen from social programs ...

The poor move the industry of "public safety" ...

The move is that poor public transport to trade ...

The poor feed on the ignorance produced on an industrial scale ...

The poor are the main raw material of easy money from the rich ...

No poor, ignorant people, alienated people, paralyzed the Global Economy ...

Without indebted poor, paying extortionate taxes, and the Global Economy ... paralyzed

What would be the National and International Banks, not the poor?

Bankruptcies and economic dependency of the poor is that they generate the wealth of the rich ...

In short, the poor are the richest of the rich ...

Without poverty, misery, hunger, misery, the rich would be poor, and the Global Economy collapse.

The poorer, the better for the rich, world overpopulation is the best deal in the world.

The poor vote, sell votes, are pious, religious, gullible, innocent and dreamy.

The poor are happy and believe in Heaven, Messiah, changes ...

Poor feeding is the rule, corrupt politicians.


RUI DE SOUZA SANTOS
Brazil, Curitiba, November 2, 2011 - 11h: 14

Pobres: Matéria prima principal da Economia Mundial

Os pobres constituem a principal fonte de riqueza da Economia Mundial.

Os pobres geram altíssimos lucros aos ricos.

As riquezas do Mundo estão nas mãos de 3% da população mundial.

97% da população mundial é pobre, e aumentam as riquezas dos 3% ricos.

Os pobres constituem a principal matéria prima da Economia Mundial.

Os pobres fornecem a mão de obra escrava.

Os pobres é que consomem os alimentos de má qualidade que os ricos não consomem.

Os pobres é que morrem nos desastres ambientais, movimentando a "indústria da morte".

Os filhos dos pobres é que morrem nos campos de batalhas, nas guerras travadas pelos ricos.

Os Países pobres compram armas feitas pelos países ricos.

Os pobres alimentam a produção das máquinas industriais.

Os pobres é que movimentam a indústria dos produtos descartáveis, de má qualidade, gerando altíssimos lucros às empresas.

Os pobres é que alimentam as Indústrias das "inutilidades"...

Os pobres são os consumistas do lixo cultural...

Os pobres é que alimentam a indústria dos sonhos infantis...

Os pobres é que consomem os produtos que não interessam aos ricos...

Os pobres movimentam os lucros das religiões...

Os pobres é que alimentam os lucros da corrupção, com o dinheiro roubado dos programas sociais...

Os pobres movimentam a indústria da "segurança pública"...

Os pobres é que movimentam ao comércio do transporte público...

Os pobres alimentam-se da ignorância produzida em escala industrial...

Os pobres constituem a matéria prima principal do lucro fácil dos ricos...

Sem países pobres, povos ignorantes, pessoas alienadas, a Economia Global paralisa...

Sem pobres endividados, pagando impostos extorsivos, e Economia Global paralisa...

O que seria dos Bancos Internacionais e Nacionais, sem os pobres?

As falências e dependências econômicas dos pobres é que geram as riquezas dos ricos...

Resumindo, os pobres são a maior riqueza dos ricos...

Sem pobreza, miséria, fome, desgraças, os ricos ficariam pobres, e a Economia Global entraria em colapso.

Quanto mais pobres, melhor para os ricos, superpopulação mundial é o melhor negócio do Mundo.

Os pobres votam, vendem votos, são devotos, religiosos, crédulos, inocentes e sonhadores.

Os pobres são felizes e acreditam no Céu, em Messias, em mudanças...

Os pobres é que alimentam o Estado, os políticos corruptos.


RUI SANTOS DE SOUZA
Brasil, Curitiba, 02 de novembro de 2011 - 11h:14

domingo, 30 de outubro de 2011

Earths Many Voices a Unified Theory for Pre-Earthquake Signals

video - setiinstitute

Residents in #Bangkok struggle to hold back #floods

Unseasonal #snowstorm hits US Northeast

Raw Video: High Tides Put #Thai Defenses to Test

Welcome to SETI Talks!

Bangkok residents evacuate homes faced with rising waters

Power Outages From East Coast Snowstorm Top 2.3M

quinta-feira, 27 de outubro de 2011

Religion and Science: Mother and Daughter, with the same DNA: (Dogma) ...

Relationship between religion and science
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Science and religion are in harmony portrayedby Louis Comfort Tiffany stained glass in the"Education" (1890).


There are several ways to think about how is the relationship between religion and science. The history of mankind shows that views about the nature of science and the nature of religion change over time, according to the philosophical and political contexts, social, economic, etc. [1], [2].

Historically, science has had a complex relationship with religion, religious doctrines sometimes científicoenquanto influenced the development of scientific knowledge has produced effects on religious beliefs. The vision of the human influence over the gods of his vision on nature and vice versa, since the human being is a point of view integral.Um be described by Stephen Jay Gould as magisteria non-overlapping (interfering or not) - in Non-English OverlappingMagisteria (NOMA) - is that science and religion deal with fundamentally different aspects of human experience, and thus, when each one of them remains in its own domain, they coexist peacefully. [3]. Another view known as the theory of conflict, says that religion and science inevitably compete for authority over the nature of reality, so that religion is gradually losing the war against science while scientific explanations become more powerful andgeneral. [4] This view was popularized in the nineteenth century by John William Draper and Andrew Dickson Whi

Overview
Science and Religion: human constructions

Religion and science are human constructions that vary over time. Within any religion there are a variety of positions, branches, according to different interpretations of scripture that they consider sacred, inspired by a god or gods, and generally regarded as direct revelations of this (s) to man. There are a large variety of theological opinions within each religion, thus following a variety of ways in which human beings see the issues involving the gods and man. So in science, there are several views of his epistemology, ie, there are different views about how scientific knowledge is generated and the nature and authority of science. Some scientists see science as an instrument to approach the Absolute Truth, others see limited and restricted to experimental limitations and rational human. Some believe that it is possible to see something, others believe that it is only possible to exclude other possibilities and think the myriad of possibilities and conjectures of the mind, human ways of thinking do not exhaust all the variables of the problem that created the experiments are limited by the pre assumptions, as is the nature and their own perceptions, and sensitivity measurements are limited to the facts.Thus, there is a wide variety of epistemological conceptions of science and religion (of how religious and scientific knowledge are acquired) and the relations between science and religion (historically and currently), ranging from antagonism and separation until the close collaboration. [5], [6], [7], [8].

Relations between Science and Religion in history

The relationship between science and religion throughout history change and involve a very large and complex range of issues such as political, social, economic, and those involving the relations of authority and power, epistemological visions of times, so of scientific practices in each time, relationship between science and society, clashes between different cultures, etc. [9], [10].

in antiquity

At all times, human beings have always sought to know the supernatural - the gods - and nature. In antiquity, there were several ways to get to know the nature, but some of them were linked to the spiritual nature of cults, cult to deities and mystical rituals, emitologia [11]. Idolatry Babylonian, Sumerian, Egyptian and later Greek consisted in worshiping the things of nature, invoking the gods as they provide what they needed or wanted. Thus, the worship of the sun god, for example, consisted of invocation of spirits, accompanied by offerings in order to obtain the favorable weather conditions for a pleasant collection. In idolatry, the manifestation of spirits on one element of nature favored the blessing desired by the worshiper. It is an animistic view, where things of nature make "life" through the invocation of the deity and the manifestation of spirits [12]. Knowledge, in antiquity, was developed on the basis of agriculture, which was administered by priests who performed the worship of idols, which were often elements of nature. Observe the results of nature was therefore closely linked to the practice of idolatry. This way of knowing nature was associated with the invocation of spirits, with the exception of Hebrew civilization, the only one who loved and trusted him creator to its provisions, not worshiping created things [13].
Beside the Greek idolatry, appeared in ancient Greek thinkers who wanted to study nature without evoking spirits. These sought to stick to reason as the main instrument for knowledge.The dialectic and discourse gained much strength during this time where the established truths were won based on logical reasoning, induction, deduction, and the persuasiveness of the scholar. Several Greek rationalist schools emerged, the most famous of which are attributed to Plato and Aristotle.

Rationalism is a philosophical movement that believes that reason is the instrument to approach the Absolute Truth. Gained momentum with the views Platonic (Plato) that the world of ideas would be a perfect world where reality is [14], [15].


in the Middle Ages

Throughout the Middle Ages, there was a power struggle between the Catholic Church and the thinkers of nature. The Church wanted to impose it was the institution that would define what is truth on all matters, including the nature. This attitude prevented the freedom of an investigative nature. Initially the knowledge and Greek was banned from the twelfth century, with Thomas Aquinas and other "church fathers", some philosophical views of the nature of the Greeks were incorporated into Catholic theology and imposed on society. Thus, the Catholic Church was concentrated in itself the authority to religious matters and the nature, authority which all must submit, under threats of terrible punishments [16]. In the sixteenth century, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) fought for the authority of science, "science will tell you how it is heaven, and religion as one goes to heaven." Galileo was pressured to recant before the Inquisition Court, saying it was a false idea that the Earth revolved around its axis and around the sun. The imposing posture of the Church, thinking that she should be who determines the Truth, also about the nature was the cause of many controversies in the early modern era. Natural philosophy began to struggle to tell society that it would study the nature and have authority to issue opinions [17].

in the Modern Age

With modernity, philosophy of nature developed its own methods of investigation and became institutionally secular, that is, independent of the Church. The observation and experimentation have been construed as being very important for the knowledge of nature. Over time the vision on how to perform the process of knowing the nature (Naturphilosophie) was modified. René Descartes (1596-1650), one of the mechanical philosophers proposed the "dualistic reality," ie, the existence of two separate worlds, "the kingdom of material extension of an essentially geometric and mechanical" and "kingdom of the substance of thought, that has no extension "[16].Thus, he divorced the mind from the body by rational belief. Rationalism is a philosophical movement that emphasizes the a priori, as a tool for ideas to approach the truth. For Descartes, the body was a machine. In the mechanistic view, the physical machine or human inventions is the same as the physics of nature. This allowed the reductionist view, where the object is considered a small sample of the world. Later, reductionism will influence modern science, where the laboratory, the reproduction of nature in the laboratory, is seen as a test sample of the world, and therefore concentrates on the status can be viewed as if nature itself. However, we know that is not nature but a human attempt to reproduce it [18].

Was gradually breaking up the old relationship between philosophy and the philosophy of nature, which later comes to be called science.This occurred when the individual sciences (the different branches of knowledge) now have a claim to independent knowledge and methodologically guaranteed. At that time, philosophy and science began to compete. This attitude was in the nineteenth century and was founded by a certain philosophy or way of understanding the world, designadapositivismo [14].

Positivism is a philosophical outlook based on inductivism in verificationism and empiricism.Empiricism is a philosophical doctrine that considers the experiment as a tool to draw near to absolute truth (gradually). Positivists do not exempt the limitations of scientific method in action, but submestimaram the influence of the worldview of the scientist and the conceptions a priori that it has about an object of study of nature. They also overestimated the experiment (together with a priori reason that designs the experiment and the experimental apparatus) as tools to check something, prove something.Furthermore, had the belief that science always progresses, the history of science has proven to be erroneous, the ebb and flow of scientific conceptions over time. Examples are the atom and the design of the light wave [7]. Some of the proponents of positivism were Francis Bacon (1561-1626), John Locke (1632-1677), George Berkeley (1685-1753), David Hume (1711-1776) and Auguste Comte (1798-1856). Empiricism reduces everything experience, without asking for a priori forms, ie, the pre-suppositions and metaphysics that involves [18]. The verificationism is the belief that it is possible to verify or prove anything with absolute certainty (the empiricists think this comes through the experiment, based on observation; rationalists think it is through reason). The inductivism is a philosophical position that sees as valid and rational exercise of the true generalization of a statement about something specific (positivism that assertion is unfounded on observation).Thus, from observations it follows a progressive law or general principle. [19].

The positivist conception of science and religion of Comte


The atheist sociologist Auguste Comte (1798-1856) intended to form a new "science of society" by positivism. The science of positivist point of view is an "exact science, methodically controlled (by the scientific method), part of experiments and observations, thus achieving, step by step, the knowledge of universal principles and higher or" facts ", such asNewton's concept of gravitation. The natural sciences have assumed that character bit by bit "[20]. What was once thought of as "facts" absolute truths, because of this dogmatic stance, called Hilton Japiassu by the philosopher of "rationalistic puritanism" (preach the primacy of the rational or scientific about other forms of knowledge, by the excessive reliance on reason as the Configurator instrument that takes the human attempt to seek absolute truth [21]) denies today understand differently.
Comte wished to accomplish a collective dominance by the combined forces who led the society (bankers and capitalists) to the circle of scientists positivists, with views of the authority of science to replace the authority of the clergy and nobility. Auguste Comte argued that the individual human knowledge (the various branches of knowledge) goes through three stages: religious, philosophical and scientific.Thus, Comte thought there were three historical periods: the time religious man explaining phenomena using supernatural causes; time in philosophic explained using rational principles, the scientific age, explained by natural laws, which by itself explain Thus only the phenomena he gave authority to speak for science over nature, winning the religious dogmatism, which was the Church's attempt to centralize itself the authority to speak on the nature [14].

Comte's desire was to found a "kind of religion of humanity" where the love of humanity would be the "ultimate nature", and preached altruism.Comte's positivism had the following pillars: 1) can be detached from the real from the imaginary, 2) is to be encouraged, which has application to improvement of life and not the "idle", 3) before the decision is right what is "logical harmony", 4) the belief that there is accurate and that this should be preferred before the uncertain, 5) the constructive (the idea of ​​progress) should be chosen over the position "critical-negative"; and 6) the relative (to stop the imposition and dogmáticade claim absoluteness of theology and metaphysics) [14].
Auguste Comte argued that the individual human knowledge (the various branches of knowledge) goes through three stages: religious, philosophical and scientific. At that time religious man explains the phenomena using supernatural causes; philosophical at the time, explains using rational principles, the scientific age, explained by natural laws, which by itself explain the phenomena [14].

From Modern to Contemporary Age

Great revolutions in scientific thought, especially in physics, with quantum physics and relativity of Einstein, encouraged further study of history and epistemology of science in the twentieth century.Gaston Bachelard, Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, Lakatos Emri and other scientists, philosophers and historians of science have tried to describe the process of doing science based on the studies of history of science and logic. They realized, scientific development that has occurred in the late nineteenth to the twentieth century, the positivist assumptions about science, such as reliance on observation and also exacerbated the pre-logical assumptions that led to the creation of the experiments, were points that should beReformed epistemology in science [22]. These philosophers of science have raised the presence of various subjective factors in the thinking of scientists who ultimately provide even misunderstandings about the nature. Thus, the imagination, vision of the person on God or the gods and the origin of the universe, its social, political, their assumptions about efficiencies of experimental apparatus and devices (and those that reproduce with fidelity to nature, pre-conceptions or beliefs about the behavior of nature, are elements that should be considered when analyzing the process of doing science - even the rigors of the modern definition of science they have to be excluded from the process. [23] The scientific method is currently set as a filter for minimal personal origin of such influences within science by requiring consistency constant, the simple and comprehensive, with the natural world.

Today we know that the laboratory experiment is trying to play one of what happens in nature, exposing part of nature but not nature in its entirety. [24]. Thus, the simplified nature so that we can study it, because if we fail to realize the immense number of variables that involve a real or natural system simultaneously, we have to do it piecemeal. The measurement process is a limited system chosen a second chance and pre-theoretical assumptions, which can be refined to the limit of practical implementation, not ending, however, absolute precision. Accordingly, the complete description of nature in all its details is not reachable even for modern science: the science builds models of nature, and understand through these models. These can be refined to the limit imposed by practical conditions, but more that the same work, a model of nature is not nature itself. In this respect the history of science has shown to produce valid knowledge about nature is a major challenge for mankind [23], [25].

Limitations of Science and Religion

It is inherent to the human quest to understand the supernatural (and thus to understand its origin and purpose) and also to know the nature and live with it, take care of it and extract from it sustenance and provision. The human being has their opinions about both, about God or the gods and the nature, it is an integral being, thinking about its origin and purpose and that is embedded in nature. He carries his world view in all the activities you do. Their assumptions and ways of searching are influenced by their way of thinking about the world, ie, their subjectivity is present with you in all the activities it performs.Evidence for the presence of subjectivity in the process of doing science has been reported by several students of the history and philosophy of science such as Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Gaston Bachelard, ImreLakatos, Alexandre Koyré and others [26], [27], [28 ].

The branch of philosophy that deals with views on how human beings come to know is chamadaepistemologia. There are several attitudes and beliefs of how scientific knowledge is given. So there are a variety of positions and beliefs (views) of epistemological science [29], [28].

Nature of the scientific, historical approach

Since the sixteenth century to the present day, has been the common view that religion and science use different methods to address different issues and the scientific method an objective approach to measure, calculate and describe the natural world, physical and materialreligions and the more subjective, based on the varying notions of authority, revelation, intuition, belief in the supernatural, the individual experience, or a combination of these to understand the universe. However, philosophers of science like Thomas Kuhn, throughout the history of science, realized that the subjective elements of the human being are also present in humans that examines the nature or do science [30]. Thus, the pre-suppositions, hypotheses and theoretical models, the methods of deductive reasoning (linked to assumptions and beliefs that are exhausted by the variables of the problem model used) and inductive (which makes use of generalizations), forms measuring the object of study and measurements of these sensors are variables that are also part of scientific practice and are often subjective, limited and contaminated by the visions that each scientist brings, regardless of their desire to remain impartial and its ethical commitment to seek the truth and give faithful witness to what he perceives [17].


Limitations of science and deception

The limitations of science and the nature of the errors that it incurs are part of the condition of human activity it is. This in no way invalidates because she has made important contributions to humanity, such as vaccines, electricity, refrigeration of food, etc., as well as better understanding of the behavior of nature, although these are limited, temporary and subject toerrors.

Some scientific views that were later considered mistakes of science, which strongly influenced the human thinking involved the central themes of science as the possibility of the infinite, the nature of matter and chemical reactions, the origin of life, the cause of epidemics. Some examples of errors of science were the geocentric model (the idea that the planets revolved around the Earth), Euclidean geometry, the Theory of Relativity Newton, caloric (it was believed that heat was a substance and not a form of energy), etc. [31]. It is worth mentioning that the use of the term error refers to comparisons between old theories and theories later, since scientific knowledge is constantly under construction (see section Science and Religion: human constructions).

Every human being has a position on the gods and like it or not your vision about that influences all other areas of your life, because we are whole beings and we can not separate our views on the vision we have of the gods of nature. Thus, all positions must be respected and should avoid postures or intolerant attitudes that diminish any human being by his conception of God or nature.Science has rigors, and seeks to avail himself of the observation, experimentation, but also the assumptions, models, logical reasoning to better understand the nature and help society to have better quality of life (provision, sustenance, survival). However, scientists, like all human beings are not free of mistakes as they often show different nature is the way the man assumed, since the human limitations prevent them from controlling all the variables of the experiment and the assumptions of human mind sometimes make mistakes and fail to achieve the complexity of the world around us. Therefore, both the reason (rational conjecture) and observation (limited to the human senses: touch, hearing, vision, and equipment which it is taken for measurements) are restricted, limited and flawed [17].

According to Martins, "despite all the comings and goings and perpetual uncertainty, there is no doubt that our scientific knowledge is superior to two centuries ago, or of antiquity. But it is accepting the uncertainties and abandoning the blind dogmatism that science can continue to progress and change. And not by a naive optimism and devoid of criticism "[32].

Examples of mistakes of Science in human history

Some examples of errors of scientific theories or thoughts of scientific revolutions throughout history were the reform of Newtonian gravitation theory with Einstein's General Relativity, for example. But as soon as changes occur views on the behavior of nature throughout history, part science, and how the history of science shows, sometimes there is the theoretical positions taken very ancient, centuries later, when it perceives some inconsistency in current view. An example is the atomistic view, coming from the ancient Greeks and then was dropped by the Aristotelian view of the 5 elements and then resumed the centuries. Another example would be the corpuscular nature of light, which was Newton's view, which was abandoned by the sight of Huygens wave and later resumed at the Modern Physics, which allowed the birth of quantum physics [33].

Limitations of Religions

Both science and religion are human constructions, and as such, subject to mistakes and human limitations. Religions are based on generally (but not always) in the interpretation of scripture held sacred, or hermeneutics, the branch of theology that studies the gods.Religions are subject to other views about the world and the interests of political, social, economic, philosophy, etc. as well as any institution including the scientific community [12].

Conclusion

Religion and science are not instruments to attain the Absolute Truth, as they are subject to errors because they are made by humans, although there may be positions dogmatic, intolerant or overpowering, both about religion and science. However, for those who believe in gods, a creator of monotheism in the case - these are usually the truth and the holy scriptures are truth revealed, the perpetrators of these deities, made through the use of designated and writers inspired by them. Dogmatic and intolerant attitudes appear to have search status, authority over the other, for purposes of exercise of power and domination over others (linked to self-exaltation and pride humans). Unfortunately, the history of mankind shows that there was use of intolerance, bigotry and imposition of both religion and science. Examples of these intolerances are respectively the Inquisition in the Middle Ages and the scientific dogmatism of some scientists today (as Richard Dawkins ridicules the belief in gods told by him with arguments as scientific, but full of visions said that absolute truths and extrapolate beyond the scope assumptions and the limited human trials or attempts to reproduce the nature of the artificial and restricted the number of simultaneous variables that humans can control. In this sense, one should avoid any behavior that disparages or devalues ​​the design of our neighbors and strike the values ​​of equality among all people, whether arising out of religion and science. The equality and respect have been objects of struggle and goals for living the good sought by various regulatory agencies in the world, values ​​which safeguard the rights humanosvisam [21].

A matter of choice?

There are several positions when considering the relationship between science and religion.This will complete the merger of the incompatibility between science and religion.Nothing prevents, however some positions have elements of more than one of these positions or categories. The advocates of these positions have, each, arguments defending his views and criticizing the other points. The risk assessment is left to the reader.

Current position against the tenets of science

In the positivist view of science [28] (see also item Relationships between Science and Religion in history-in the modern age), there is the Scientific Method as a watershed between scientific and unscientific. The Scientific Method considers the natural evidence - after a few considerations that give rise to the so-called scientific facts - as absolute truths involved in the production of scientific knowledge. On these facts, which together form a single set valid in its entirety for all seats scientific ideas are proposals to connect them in a natural relation of cause and effect. The ideas in science are never taken as absolute as they are in perpetual mandatory testing, in perpetual conflict with known facts, and especially with the fact that perhaps may be discovered. Ideas are always open to change so they can fit all the facts then known in harmony, forming inseparably along with these, what is called a scientific theory.Thus, the scientific method explicitly prohibits the existence of dogma in science. The science and its theories evolve over time.

In religion is almost always the opposite.Dogmatic ideas, taken as absolute truths, and is generally recorded the same in a sacred tome, which are always absolute and incontestable but rarely spelled denotative but connotative, and yet revealed by one or more beings omnipotent, omniscient and all-seeing (gods) beings for which there is no concrete evidence of existence - with the same matters of faith - are the cornerstones of any religion. When natural events directly confronted with the tenets of a religion, dogma, they also founded on faith and not fact, what usually happens when religion and its dogmas try to make sense of understanding of the phenomena encountered in the natural world we live in, religion are obliged to deny these facts, ignore them, hide them, or "adjust" them to their dogmas, since their dogmas can not switch to adjust to contradictory facts. Associated with the fanaticism of many, many cases were cited where the facts, along with their discoverers, just literally incinerated.

Galileo Galilei, the father of modern science and the scientific method has not been proven, for some, this attitude of the religious view of the statements, though suffering penalties brought by his inquisitors that, not much smaller, if not killed him in the flesh, killed him, unceremoniously, in full, with regard to its scientific output and the "discomfort" they caused.

In these terms the science does not enter the religious sphere as science, despite adopting the scientific method and be based on the results obtained using the same - a method in which dogmatism, in this scenario, because almost no space is never coherently to produce valid knowledge about the natural world in which we live, this is limited to simply adopt ideas not dogmatic. She does not go beyond that, you fight through any dogmatic idea. Science is not at war with religion declared so. However, it is verified that the history of science is full of reports of landslides usually painful dogmas, often ancient, compared to natural facts gradually discovered over time, both with regard to extreme positions within science itself and in relation to religions.

It should be noted therefore that the current front position of science to religion is not to deny the existence of a god or gods: science does not claim that god or gods do not exist. However the position of science is a current position on the nature, where any fact or natural phenomenon are automatically objects of study, these terms and the absence of supernatural facts ametafísica places beyond the reach of science.The proposal "There is a God omnipotent, omniscient and all-seeing" is by definition outside the scope of a scientific hypothesis, since, like the statement "emeralds are green or not green," it violates the boundaries that define a scientific hypothesis, the be testable and falsifiable necessarily face the facts of nature. Both cases cited are not falsifiable in the face of natural facts and lie therefore outside the realm of science and the natural world.

It comes down to the attitude of modern science in the phrase "Science does not go the merits of the gods." Accordingly it is perfectly possible coexistence between science and religion since science does not extend beyond the boundaries of the natural world, not manifesting itself and therefore can not therefore impose any conditions on any dogma present in religious doctrines, expressly provided that these dogmas do not come into contradiction with natural fact - scientific fact - any natural or scientific theory. In terms of religion would be an extension of science beyond the natural world beyond the borders of the known, coexisting in harmony with science. However, the converse is not true.There is no room for dogma and dogmatic positions within science in its modern version, and science is not concerned with the study of "universes" or "phenomena" physically inaccessible. These are outside of its domain, and as such, it says nothing about them or desafirma.

Conflicts between religion and science arise only when they want to impose religious dogma on natural facts checked and scientific theories that have natural explanations for these facts, even when in explicit contradiction to these.Accordingly, the dogmatic religious stance ends up by enemy science as natural facts, scientific facts as true, are necessarily subject to studies of science and its theories. However this is not a problem for science - do not worry that in principle the religious dogmas - but a problem for their religious and dogmatic positions only, provided that they do not want to make use of political authority or mass give priority to its tenets, the last case in which science can not abstain and comes into play, often creating conflicts of epic proportions in the most bitter [34].

Position of Conflict

This position emphasizes the differences between science and religion and considers religious education as being incompatible with science education. This view has major influence of the positivist Comte's religion, commented on the history of this page, where religion is seen as a step lower on the cognitive development of knowledge of the history of mankind (see history). So for people who adopt this position, religious education is a threat to science education because there are, according to them, "metaphysical incompatibilities, doctrinal, methodological and attitudinal" [35].

People who espouse this view deny the relationship between science and religion. They are also called "puritanical rationalist" because they are adherents of rationalism in which reason the system is established as the absolute system. According Japiassu, adherents of rationalism promote a scientism which states that "science is the only way that may lead us to the Truth, and consequently the Good Fair [36]. Rationalism differs from the rationale. The Rationality by material use of reason and the reason is that it is understood that reason is limited and is not therefore omnipotent. Rationalism is a "belief that every object can only be considered and solved by a good use of reason" [37] . Rationalism can be seen as a worldview that excludes all irrational, emotional feelings, needs, passions, in short, all subjectivity [21].

Rationalism and Scientism

According Japiassu [21], rationalism and scientism gained ground in the 2nd half of the nineteenth century, when science would put itself the power to explain everything, placing itself as absolute reference, and thus to perform the role of religion on society [38].

Thus, in this position, religion is seen as linked to the subjective faith and reason and science (and science experiment), therefore preach the superiority of science to say in the world. Some scientists go so far that vision to use her knowledge to make statements about God or gods, such as Richard Dawkins in his controversial book "The God Delusion" [39], where he treats those who believe as beingsless intelligent, claiming that it is wiser not to believe in gods. Other contemporary scholars such as Daniel Dennett eMichel Onfray, along with Dawkins, consider that there are benefits of religion.

According to the defenders' argument mismatch, science and religion are incompatible because they produce knowledge in a way exactly opposite. In science we have, in accordance with the modern definition, the Scientific Method as a watershed between scientific and unscientific.The Scientific Method considers the natural evidence - after a few considerations that give rise to the so-called scientific facts - as absolute truths involved in the production of scientific knowledge. On these facts, which together form a single set valid in its entirety for all seats scientific ideas are proposals to connect them in a natural relation of cause and effect.

Religion has been the opposite. Dogmatic ideas, taken as absolute truths, and is generally recorded the same in a sacred tome, which are always absolute and incontestable but rarely spelled denotative but connotative, and yet revealed by one or more beings omnipotent, omniscient and all-seeing (god or gods) beings for which there is no evidence of existence - with the same matters of faith - are the cornerstones of any religion.

The scientific and religious dogmatism and its dangers

The scientific dogmatism has been a reaction to religious dogmatism. Historically, when natural evidence directly confronted the tenets of a religion, founded on faith (and not evidence of observations), the Catholic Church, not wanting to lose his authority to speak what is true also about the nature of those who thought pursueddifferently, acting intolerant and imposing. An example is the clash between Galileo Galilei and the Catholic Church [16].

Thus, authoritarianism and religious imposition occur when religion and its dogmas try to make sense of understanding of the phenomena encountered in the natural world in which we live.The opposite side to that is the scientific atheism dogmatic, that you want, using science (as well as his authority), deluded [40]. The dogmatism of both the religions and science is something harmful because it prevents dialogue, generates conflict and even violence. Both religion and science are human constructions, and, as such, subject to mistakes and subject to the limitations intrinsic to being human. However, for those who believe, the gods and the sacred scriptures, the revelation (s) creator (s) are true and that belief must be respected as well as those who do not believe in a god or gods must be respected. The dialogue and communication has been cited by educators and psychiatrists as critical to the construction of knowledge of the individual and society, as well as transparency and freedom of dialogue and non-violent ncomunicação, essential to avoid conflicts between people [41], [ 42].

The ideas in science should not be taken as absolute as they are in perpetual mandatory testing, in perpetual conflict with known facts, and especially with the fact that perhaps may be discovered. Ideas are always open to change so they can fit all the facts then known in harmony, forming inseparably along with these, what is called a scientific theory. Moreover, the history of science has shown is that even the rigors of reason and experiments and the uncertainties arising from the science they do not prevent many mistakes from the mistakes in the pre-suppositions, hypotheses, design the way of measuring and experimental apparatus and many other variables such as subjective order social and economic influences that drive the scientific community and their investigations.Some of these mistakes has lasted for centuries and the errors have been part of scientific activity throughout history as the rule rather than exception [43] (see item limitations of science and religion).

Complementarity and Integration Position

In the position of complementarity or integration, the similarities between science and religion are emphasized. Science deals with natural and experiential issues, but the answers to existential problems lies with religion. So there is a complementarity. An example of this position is the geneticist Francis Collins, who sees no incompatibility between being a scientist and have faith. [44] Until the nineteenth century, most scientists were believers. From the 2nd half of the nineteenth century, the position of conflict has been more frequent in the scientific community [17].

Position of Indifference

The other no matter the issue. Or is simply religious, or just scientist. The parallel does not matter.

Position Fusion


Some opt for a merger between the ways of seeing the world. There are religions with characteristics of science and science with the characteristics of religion: Scientology is an example.

Worldviews

Another way to understand the positions on science and religion are the worldviews concerning the origin of the world and its government:
A: Creationism - an omnipotent being created the world and the first man.
B: Big Bang, Abiogenesis, and Evolution Biogenesis - scientific paradigms that explain respectively the origin of the universe, the origin of life, and the diversity and complexity of vidacomo result of any changes and selective simplest living organisms - by the reproduction process - resulting of natural laws.
C: Intelligent Design - Life comes from an omnipotent and transcendent indirectly. An intelligent designer has provided the ability to model the matter and gave impetus to development.

The people stand on the issues: deleting, combining or merging.